| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory |
| From: | Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Dec 2015 23:26:22 +0100 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Jorge,> So V47T or CR3OO would change for SOAB HP ASSISTED to win the plaque and this is ok for you? Yes as it is perfectly compliant with the rules (... you may use ... not ... you must use ... spotting assistance) thus nothing wrong with it. I would even applaud them for their clever decision as well as their great achievement (doing more with less). 73, Olli _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Category hopping, Maarten van Rossum |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] High Rate Dual Radio CQing, Eric Gruff |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory, Steve London |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory, Chuck Dietz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |