CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey Results - part 2

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey Results - part 2
From: W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 09:10:53 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I think everyone would be in favor of removing unique known busted calls.

Isn't the question to remove ALL uniques? So if my Son W0TOL works only me in a contest I get penalized or I get my friends that don't normally work contests to get on and work me and they choose to work only me I should get penalized?

The way the question was worded and the way *I* interpreted it was that ALL uniques should be removed. I do not agree with that.

W0MU

On 12/30/2015 8:27 AM, James Cain wrote:
I am shocked by the votes on "Remove Uniques?" Who could oppose removing 
uniques, which are, as CQ's official comment says, obviously busted call signs?

If I bust anything in a contact, and it's indisuptable from log-checking, I 
want the sponsor to remove the contact. Period.

K1TN
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>