CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 - Robotic Contesting

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] FT4 - Robotic Contesting
From: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 23:17:09 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The fundamental reason for FTx needing it's own contest format is that it's a fixed rate which is set by software.  The exchanges are essentially synchronous and slaved to a common clock.  So if ops can keep the pipeline full, there is no differentiator among "run" speeds.  All of the current RTTY contests have rate as a fundamental factor so using that format in a FTx contest makes no sense.  Additionally, as the rate is machine limited for the most part, if the FTx contest is going to have staying power it's got to offer some other challenge which op skill development can address.  High rates in RTTY depend on operator execution among a sea of variables - in FTx that element is essentially gone.

A format that rewards for distance seems a better fit - perhaps the Stew Perry format where points scale with distance and the exchange is grid square.  A contest built around something like that where the score is most influenced first by distance and then other factors a weak second would match well with the strength of these modes.

73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com

On 5/1/19 8:25 PM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
I agree, please keep FT? contests separate from RTTY. Unlike FT?, RTTY
decoders are not perfect. To do well a RTTY operator needs to quickly look
at multiple decoders to determine what the callsign and report most likely
are. There is nothing automatic and there are no set TX/RX times so every
operator can be as efficient as they choose. It is easy to send a quick
hello to your friends during the QSO, just like on CW and SSB.

John KK9A


Jeff Blaine AC0C wrote:

The FT8/4 modes need to have contests specifically built around the
capabilities and limitations of the mode.

Mixing FTx into the RTTY contests falls squarely into a category of
things that we SHOULD NOT DO, even though we have the capability to do.

73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>