Charles,
Can you give us some results from your tests with the Zcomax card in the New
Base Station boards?
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 2003-Mar-03 at 11:48 AM Charles Chia Sheng Wu wrote:
>Zcomax - we are currently testing them w/ the new boards as we speak...
>
>-Charles
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
>[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of Bob Hrbek
>Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 10:51 AM
>To: Karlnet Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Intro
>
>
>
>
>> Both brands of the high-powered card are getting a lot warmer than your
>typical Orinoco card. We've solved the temperature problem very simply by
>leaving covers off or adding a small fan in some cases.
>>
>> Signal information - Yes that's quite interesting... When you use the
>configurator wireless link test all of the high-power cards except one,
>shows believable values for Local SNR, signal, noise. The Remote values
>are
>always SNR 1, Signal -94, Noise -95 The exception to this is one high
>power
>Zcomax card that shows believable values for both Local and Remote. We
>have
>no idea why this one card provides different results. The important thing
>is of course that it works...
>>
>
>So...which card is that?
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Karlnet mailing list
>Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
>http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
>_______________________________________________
>Karlnet mailing list
>Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
>http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|