> But as AD1C observed, this has a religious aspect to it. :-)
Amen!
73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] USOS FIGS
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:24:47 -0400, Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
> wrote:
>
>>After all, if less errors is the goal, then (-) is the way
>>to go.
>
> REPLY:
>
> With more than a hundred RTTY contests in the log, my experience says
> otherwise.
> The issue is't the number of errors, it is the number of requests for
> repeats.
> That may sound like the same thing, but it isn't. If you take the exchange
> 599-017-017. one error (a missing figs shift at the beginning) will make
> it
> print as TOO-PQU-PQU and most ops will ask for a repeat. By comparison,
> with 599
> 011 011 and USOS, that same missing figs shift will print as TOO 011 011
> and
> most ops will get it.
>
> I grant you that the more experienced ops will figure out the "PQU" but
> the
> newer ops won't, and there are always lots of newer ops in any contest.
> Just one
> request for a repeat will burn up more time than you save with hundreds of
> hyphens.
>
> But as AD1C observed, this has a religious aspect to it. :-)
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|