TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Why no mention of TT?
From: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:56:49 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Nuts.   Does not mean anything.   You are reading into it more than 
appears warranted by the text, reaching your own conclusions for reasons 
not stated in the text.

They did not mention everyone.  So he said Elecraft and Flex are 
"newcomers" -- the fact he did not mention all the "oldcomers" means 
nothing.

I say the only way to know is to ask him, so I did.  I will let you know 
what I hear... of anything...

=======================================James -K8JHR  ==============



I will let you know what he says.
On 11/16/2011 1:41 PM, Steve Hunt wrote:
> Subject says it all!
>
> http://www.edn.com/article/519742-Ham_radio_in_the_21st_century.php
>
> Steve G3TXQ
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>