To: | <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [Towertalk] Pruning a dipole |
From: | swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith) |
Date: | Wed, 26 Jun 2002 08:14:14 -0500 |
>So, all we are doing is using more sofisticated >methods to arrive closer I am sorry to see that "pruning a dipole" appears to have gone the way of CW. It used to make a great rite of passage. Frankly, no matter what the computer model says, I would STILL cut it longer and trim it up, just to be safe, but then I'm an OT. I think anyone who thinks they can actually get it perfect the first time is in for disappointment. Has anyone figured out how to accurately model "end effect?" Mark, N5OT |
Previous by Date: | [Towertalk] Raised Guy Stays, Bill Hider (N3RR) |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Towertalk] 468/f, jljarvis |
Previous by Thread: | [Towertalk] 468/f - don't bother, here's why ARRL dropped it., David L. Thompson |
Next by Thread: | [Towertalk] Guy wire resonance. Break it up or use stubs?, David Jordan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |