Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ 158 ]

Total 158 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] 813 Amplifiers & Key Clicks... (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:44:20 -0500
Good Day All, I've only just joined this group to-day, so please forgive me if it might appear that I'm attempting to re-hash old stuff that's already been discussed to death... I'm interested in the
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00502.html (6,784 bytes)

2. [Amps] 4-1000A Toobs... (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:29:43 -0500
Good Evening All, Does anyone know of a reputable place where one might get a 4-1000/A tube, or two, for use in an amplifier project (Amateur service, of course) -- AND at a reasonable price...? Many
/archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00570.html (6,285 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] RFI Question (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:30:45 -0500
Hi Mike, "...Made In China" says it all, I'm afraid... You'll get no satisfaction from this experience, apart from the one that might only come from stomping all over the devices with your jack boots
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00064.html (8,667 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] FW: RFI Question (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:51:37 -0500
There WAS a spray-on RFI shielding "paint" available many, many moons ago, per a "New Products" listing in QST, back in the early/mid 80's, as I recall... The writer touted the advantages such a prod
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00087.html (9,281 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] QSK or not (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:37:13 -0500
Hi Ron, Whilst I agree that QSK really CAN be advantageous in a pile-up situation, I personally find it to be EXTREMELY distracting, to the point of being an annoyance... When I monitor my signal, I
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00416.html (10,027 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] QSK or not (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:46:50 -0500
Hi Jim, Well, I've tried QSK -- tried to FORCE myself to like it, even! -- but it's just not for me, I'm afraid...reminds me too much of operating SSB with the VOX delay control set to near zero, whe
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00427.html (10,815 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:54:15 -0500
Hi Bud, Back in about '73, or so, having just gotten licensed 2 years earlier, I was "blessed" with my one & only visit from a representative of the Department of Communications here (our FCC) due to
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00429.html (13,625 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:07:25 -0500
Welr id reponsi tm tsat comnent thae yov ar rinst -- QSK is a gomb waq tm egsure that oup cw & keyinn is alwws cornect and sett paoperlq... ~73!~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ PS: Have you taken a REALLY good
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00437.html (10,331 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] HB amps (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 08:33:27 -0500
Hi Guys, No matter the IMD characteristics one db. either way, I'm of the opinion that if somebody wants to uphold the noble Amateur Radio tradition of our group being a collection of "...tinkerers &
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00083.html (11,655 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Happy birthday to... (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:14:35 -0500
Greetings All, Well now, there's at least ONE thing I share with greatness -- about as close to greatness as I'll ever get! Hi Hi To-day -- 16th March 2006 -- is the 54th anniversary of MY natal even
/archives//html/Amps/2006-03/msg00465.html (11,656 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] New Elecraft Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:13:16 -0500
HA...!!! ...And to think that my compadres said that I was MAD for homebrewing a linear around a pair of surplus 813's...! I feel both vindicated and exonerated...looks like the price of being an app
/archives//html/Amps/2006-04/msg00376.html (10,472 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] 813's (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 17:29:59 -0500
Re. ANY horizontally-mounted tube, the trick is to ensure that the expanded filament (expanded due to heat) doesn't sag down & short-out against the grid... Warnings about aligning pin "X" & pin "Y"
/archives//html/Amps/2006-05/msg00434.html (10,081 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] Roller inductor grease? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 06:35:19 -0500
Hi Kevin, I apply a drop, or two, of regular CASTOR OIL on the moving parts of all my roller inductors and air variable capacitors here... Once every couple of years seems to do the trick, or wheneve
/archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00001.html (7,645 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] R. MEASURES PRAYERS ANSWERED (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 06:14:36 -0500
Hi Guys, After watching this thread take a complete life all its own lo these many days, I think it's time for EVERYONE to simply switch the computer power switch to OFF, and the Ham Radio switches t
/archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00087.html (14,139 bytes)

15. [Amps] Cleaning OT Components... (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 05:28:34 -0500
Good Morning All, I think I may well have stumbled upon yet another application for the good ol' automatic dishwasher in the kitchen...CLEANING BLACK, WRINKLE-FINISHED COMPONENTS...! Specifically in
/archives//html/Amps/2006-06/msg00252.html (7,306 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:56:59 -0500
Hi Colin, Geez, but I've been a Ham here for 35 years, & have scratch-built no less than three COMPLETE Ham stations (including two superheterodyne receivers), & I'll be darned if there isn't a singl
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01370.html (12,364 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] Ameritron Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:31:52 -0500
Hi Fern, Those Viewstar amplifiers were first-rate all the way, to be sure. I first saw one "up close & personal" at a Hamfest some 24 years ago, and really admired its construction. It looked like t
/archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01389.html (13,446 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] Estate sale - USed CB Gear for re-distribution (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 06:00:05 -0500
Dave, No offence, really, but aren't you being just a tad anal about all this...? I mean, throwing otherwise good sources of parts & modifiable(sp?) rigs into a dumpster...?! Really...?!!! I'm no gun
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00283.html (11,497 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] State of the Amp (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:06:09 -0500
Hi Martin, How about HOMEBREWING a linear amplifier to YOUR specifications...? It's really not all that insurmountable a task (heck, I've built three here myself -- others have surpassed that number!
/archives//html/Amps/2006-08/msg00580.html (10,167 bytes)

20. [Amps] Need Some Experienced Feedback Here... (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Swynar" <>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 06:29:23 -0500
Good Day Gentlemen, Well, I've absolutely had my fill (and then some!) with fixed ceramic / mica transmitting capacitors in final pi-tank networks...! Please bear with me as I explain -- your comment
/archives//html/Amps/2006-09/msg00320.html (9,558 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu