Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ 353 ]

Total 353 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 30 hour WPX? (score: 1)
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:57:58 +0000 (GMT)
Hmmm. I'm not sure...maybe a bit torn. I liked the 30 hour format when it was in place, but I like operating more hours too. I think I like "more" a little bit "more" than I do like a little bit "les
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00585.html (6,884 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Attn: Old time M/M ops (score: 1)
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 00:25:47 +0000 (GMT)
Hi all: I'm working on a presentation for the contest forum at Dayton (M/M in the early daze) and I need some help with some old callsigns. Who are they now and how can I reach them? 1. W3AOH - entra
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00231.html (7,674 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] M/M op's: alternate address for KR2Q (score: 1)
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:10:19 +0000 (GMT)
Sorry that some of you are having trouble with my domain name. I am getting lots of replies there, but apparently not all. Here is an alternate address I just set up: multimulticontesters
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00236.html (6,585 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer, CQWW, how to cheat, etc (score: 1)
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:59:28 +0000 (GMT)
Pete, et al: I thank you for "keeping us in the loop" on the various progressions for Skimmer; it has been very enlightening for all readers. First, I would like to say that the comments which follow
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00297.html (8,944 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer = keyer. Of for goodness sakes! (score: 1)
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:17:11 +0000 (GMT)
Over the years, valued contest skills have constantly been eliminated via technology. 1. Sending good quality cw for the entire contest by hand - gone 2. Fashioning an appropriate and efficient dupe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00358.html (8,799 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer: ...and if it quacks like a duck... (score: 1)
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:42:56 +0000 (GMT)
I am really enjoying this thread. I haven't laughed so much, and scratched my head so much, and wondered if I am being "put on" so much in a very long time. Let's try another approach: Walk into the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00433.html (8,185 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] the GENUINE advantage of skimmer (this is not a joke) (score: 1)
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:30:59 +0000 (GMT)
What nearly everybody has missed (I'll assume some see it, but didn't say anything yet) is the HUGE benefit that Skimmer will have for use by the contest sponsors. I envision having Skimmers globally
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00500.html (7,521 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] the SECOND GENUINE advantage with Skimmer (still no joke) (score: 1)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:02:31 +0000 (GMT)
I'll assume that Dave (TTT) and others have it correct in that Skimmers will be directed into spotting nets (packet/internet/etc) when used by whomever ends up being allowed to use it (minimally, mul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00507.html (7,632 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] K3: Yup, just arrived (score: 1)
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 11:02:20 +0000 (GMT)
Guy, et al: Ordered Nov 21, shipped April 25, arrived (UPS ground from W6 to NJ) yesterday (May 2). Many folks announce their ordered/ship/receive dates on the Elecraft email reflector: http://www.el
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00064.html (7,228 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] stay off these frequencies (score: 1)
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 18:31:24 +0000 (GMT)
According to the scrolling banner on the CQ Magazine home page, the Chinese are using 7050, 7060, and 14270 for disaster communication. It is urged to stay clear of these frequencies. I don't know if
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00295.html (6,974 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] WPX SN...has to be a better way! (score: 1)
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 21:14:46 +0000 (GMT)
If condx are tough, or if you're just weak (my signal comes to mind), there has to be better way of "correcting" the sent serial number. Currently, it seems we all are limited to sending the complete
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00385.html (7,221 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] CQWW CW 2006 plaques arrived - me too! (score: 1)
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 21:09:11 +0000 (GMT)
Thanks to the gang at CQ (aka K1AR) for delivery of the 2006 cw CQWW plaque.  VFB OM!mni tnxde Doug KR2Q _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00444.html (6,962 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] single-op pornography (score: 1)
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:09:43 +0000 (GMT)
Defining "Assisted," especially in terms of Skimmer is somewhat like pornography - "I know it when I see it." [Justice Potter Stewart] In other words, observation tells much. Watch a single op and th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00390.html (7,359 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] CQ Contest Hall of Fame #1 photos (score: 1)
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:13:27 +0000 (GMT) took 22 years to get this done.  Sorry for the short delay.How many callsigns can YOU still recognize?de Doug KR2Q _______
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00538.html (6,838 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] CQ Contest Hall of Fame #1 photos: CORRECTION (score: 1)
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:47:40 +0000 (GMT)
Thanks to Chris, G3VBL for calling me on the LL to let me know that the link was corrupted. I sent it in HTML instead of TEXT and the word ONLY was unfortunately appended. Here is the correct link: h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00540.html (7,224 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] The ARRL Contest Update Newsletter (score: 1)
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:40:33 +0000 (GMT)
Ward's most recent newsletter (link shown below) includes a blurb (about half way down the page) which includes some links to my Picassa photo pages (lots of photos). I just noticed that the photo ga
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00047.html (7,345 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] if you can't do it right, don't do it all (score: 1)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:12:23 +0000 (GMT)
Since I am a member of the CQWWCC, I won't address this with respect to contesting. And I am NOT addressing this as a member of the CQWWCC. What follows is my own offering, without approval, rejectio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00143.html (8,041 bytes)

18. [CQ-Contest] ARRL and Open Logs (score: 1)
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:37:50 +0000 (GMT)
Hooray! With this new "ruling," the focus is, in my opinion, now properly placed on the root cause, which is with some QSL manager's permitting "wiggle room" with callsign mismatches. Long Live Open
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00188.html (6,590 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] open logs: RIGHT vs WRONG (score: 1)
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:18:34 +0000 (GMT)
Dear everybody, Please temper your statements by including the phrase, "in my opinion." I do not mean to "pick on" W4TV, but I in my opinion, his statement (below) is a good example: "To compel that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00241.html (7,396 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] virus, hacks, backup, "go back"....oh my (score: 1)
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:39:20 +0000 (GMT)
SJG: I use Norton Internet Security and have not had any issues with hacks, viruses, etc. Been running some version of it for many years (over 5) on various systems. I've done (or, "it" has done) wee
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00262.html (7,921 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu