Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w0mu@w0mu.com: 965 ]

Total 965 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [CQ-Contest] A little LoTW gotcha (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:11:53 -0700
I think it is easier getting top secret clearance than access to LOTW. It has to be the more user unfriendly system around and I am an IT guy. I am all for eliminating as much cheating as possible bu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00108.html (11,403 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Amcom Clear Speech (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 22:38:36 -0700
Heil purchased this line from Amcom. I recently bought an Amcom Clear Speech speaker unit at the Orlando Hamfest and would like to get more info/buy another unit but cannot find a web site. The links
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00013.html (7,897 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:04:16 -0700
According to their website they only run the net from 12pm to 10pm. So if you are going to have an emergency then you better plan it for those hours other wise you are SOL. If there is a need the FCC
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00447.html (11,041 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:08:21 -0700
It seems to me that people are relying on "cheap" ham radios for emergency communications.....If they can afford an expensive boat why in the world would you skimp on your emergency communications eq
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00449.html (11,871 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] 14.300 MHz (score: 1)
Author: W0MU-Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:13:12 -0700
NASA does not use Ham HT's for their only form of communications on the shuttle. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00478.html (9,012 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] wpx ssb spot analysis (score: 1)
Author: W0MU-Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:55:51 -0700
I was the operator of NA7XX. A couple of times I forgot to click on the running box in N1MM so I ended up spotting a number of stations that I was running by accident. Those would show as them as the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00516.html (9,404 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] wpx ssb spot analysis (score: 1)
Author: W0MU-Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:44:56 -0700
My bad! Those runs were spotted because I forgot to check the running box and having the spot all S&P contacts option enabled. I was using version 4.0197 of N1MM. This was my first contest using N1MM
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00526.html (8,462 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] wpx ssb spot analysis (score: 1)
Author: W0MU-Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:04:28 -0700
I was hooked up to my own node all weekend long, w0mu.net. I just did a sh/dx na7xx on the w0mu.net node and received a completely different list of spots. Dave's spots are listed below the spots fro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00530.html (14,898 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Rules (score: 1)
Author: W0MU-Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:06:32 -0600
Everyone competing at the Olympics is playing on the same field or running the same track. The Olympics would be a level playing field...Mano a Mano...less steroids et al. The best of the best? Hardl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00151.html (11,059 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Yaesu FTDX-9000 reflector (score: 1)
Author: W0MU-Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 22:48:16 -0600
I have created a reflector for the new Yaesu FTDX-9000. To subscribe send an email to ftdx9000-subscribe@w0mu.com Mike W0MU _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00222.html (7,341 bytes)

11. RE: [CQ-Contest] Spotters and Those Who Spot Them: A Novel Solution (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 13:12:35 -0700
I am curious why the clusters do not require any kind of real verification of who they let on their systems. Web or otherwise. Mike W0MU --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00018.html (12,306 bytes)

12. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:48:25 -0600
Let's not mix apples and oranges here. The issue of self spotting is related to contests not general operating. Participants claiming to be unassisted yet they get spotted repeatedly by bogus calls a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00303.html (16,189 bytes)

13. RE: [CQ-Contest] Re: self-spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:01:04 -0600
Mark, You might be right on that point. I would have seriously wonder about sending spots but not receiving them. I guess it would be no different than a guy claiming to be unassisted while all along
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00308.html (18,311 bytes)

14. RE: [CQ-Contest] Does packet spotting really helps rate that much???? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 19:38:52 -0600
Jose, What band was this taken from. Did you look at 40 or 80 or even 160? I would expect high rates on the high bands most of the time anyway. Finding the big gun expeditions is usually not all that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00330.html (12,701 bytes)

15. RE: [CQ-Contest] cqww ssb spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 13:54:31 -0700
I have to disagree. Spotting helps. I was just playing around in the WW test and it was fun just to click on spots and go work people. Would I have worked them anyway? Maybe. Many of the Carib statio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00168.html (11,175 bytes)

16. RE: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:58:07 -0700
It would be interesting to correlate the spots with actually contest-pedition logs to see if indeed there was a spike in the rate. I have no issues with cheerleading as long as it is not done by thos
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00179.html (14,081 bytes)

17. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 17:58:17 -0700
I believe you can use the year of the station owners license or the operator(s). Who cares as long as you copy what they sent. Mike W0MU Sweepstakes rule: 4.4. Check (the last two digits of the year
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00560.html (9,239 bytes)

18. RE: [CQ-Contest] Phone Phollies (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:51:13 -0700
Only had a few of these and they threw me. I sent nearly all my reports with my own voice. Mike W0MU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00588.html (7,335 bytes)

19. RE: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:50:29 -0700
And what do Muti-ops do? Change their check each time the operator changes? Mike W0MU It isn't clear that the SS check is always the year of first licensing of the station owner. Many may interpret i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00604.html (10,107 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] SO2R Again (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:35:21 -0700
I just completed my first SO2R contest and I can say that It could be improved. The second station with low power is not fun. I got trounced and trounced. It might be fine for finding mults and movin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00703.html (12,845 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu