[Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877

To:	<amps@contesting.com>
Subject:	[Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877
From:	wlfuqu00@uky.edu (Bill Fuqua)
Date:	Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:27:17 -0500

I have doubts that the products that started this discussion really exist.

73
Bill wa4lav


At 10:10 AM 11/7/2002 -0500, Bill Fuqua wrote:
>PEP is the AVERAGE power for one full cycle calculated at the peak of the 
>envelope.
>There is no RMS power. There is RMS current and RMS voltage.  RMS voltage 
>times RMS current (both in phase) equals
>average power.
>
>73
>Bill wa4lav
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, Martin, Maximo [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, DF3KV@aol.com [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, Bill Fuqua [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, Bill Fuqua <= [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, Martin, Maximo [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, Martin, Maximo [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, Bill Fuqua [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, Steve Thompson [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, wl fuqua [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, DF3KV@aol.com [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, Rich [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, DF3KV@aol.com [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, TimNebo@aol.com [Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, Terry Gaiser

Previous by Date:	Fw: RE: [Amps] 2 x 8877 amp, skipp isaham
Next by Date:	[Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, Martin, Maximo
Previous by Thread:	[Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, Bill Fuqua
Next by Thread:	[Amps] RMS-PEP & 2x8877, Martin, Maximo
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]