On Aug 25, 2004, at 1:12 PM, Joe Isabella wrote:
Prezactly... Except that it allows wider digital modes in the "CW"
bands, and it limits SSB Voice
to 3 kHz. I'm not a big fan of this move by the League -- seems silly
to put these limits in
place on voice. I think I'll move to Canada...eh??
Joe -- Letting the amateur radio community determine how a band is used
has worked well enough on 160m. The vast CW wasteland presently on 80m
is a good example of bad rule-making.
end
Joe
--- Vic Rosenthal <vic@rakefet.com> wrote:
R.Measures wrote:
Thanks, Joe. So this means that if adopted, 10m FM as well as AM
will
be illegal.
The bandwidth allowed in 29.0 - 29.7 MHz is 16 KHz.
There is a specific provision to allow DSB AM in the 3 KHz areas:
"(1) The 3 kHz maximum bandwidth does not apply to double-sideband
amplitude-modulated phone A3E emissions which are limited to --26 dB
bandwidths of 9 kHz."
You can read the whole thing at:
<http://www.arrl.org/announce/bandwidth.html>
It's not going to make any revolutionary changes.
--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|