Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Audio BW, *WAS* Centurion cooling improvement ...

To: Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Audio BW, *WAS* Centurion cooling improvement ...
From: Joe Isabella <n3ji@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 17:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
This is a falacy.  My DSP rig does not allow any significant energy in the 
opposite sideband. 
However, when there is enough low frequency content, it can sound like a 
carrier when you tune
through the signal.  If there was a carrier, you would also hear it when there 
was no modulation,
which is NOT the case.  I know -- I have checked my signal with a spectrum 
analyzer.

This is the kind of incorrect information that creates bogus complaints and 
rules that we don't
need.  I suggest that anyone wishing to point fingers get a spectrum analyzer 
and look at their
own signals with their compressors cranked up overdriving their amplifiers.  
Then talk to me about
4 or 6 kHz being too wide.

Joe,
N3JI

--- Frank Mayer <domino@worldlynx.net> wrote:

> Having bass that extends well below 100hz will cause a SSB signal to be wide 
> by  modulating too
> close to the carrier point, crossing over onto the other sideband, and 
> virtually turning into a
> DSB signal  If you don't believe this just try tuning a "hi-fi" guy in on 
> using the AM mode. 
> The signal will be 100% intelligible!!  You can even hear the carrier when 
> you tune across one
> of these signals.  Plus the fact when one tries to force over 10db of extra 
> energy at very low
> or very high frequencies the IMD is terrific and that also contributes to the 
> width of the
> signal.
> 
> WY3D
> ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Joe Isabella 
>   To: Amps 
>   Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 3:02 PM
>   Subject: Re: [Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service
> 
> 
>   Apparently, I'm one of "these morons".  However, be careful not to cast 
> stones when you live
> in a
>   glass house, because "Bassiness" has nothing to do with the extended BW.  
> Only the high
>   frequencies take up the extra amount between 3 and 6 kHz.  I run out to 6k 
> sometimes, but only
>   when there is enough space.  I'll continue to use my bottom end even if I 
> only run out to
> 3.2kHz
>   or so.
> 
>   One other thing to keep in mind is that these rules only affect the US.  
> There are many
> Canadians
>   running 6k SSB (hence my moving to Canada comment), so don't expect all the 
> 6k SSB to
> miraculously
>   disappear.  Their gov't allows 6k in the voice spectrum which is plenty.  I 
> don't understand
> why
>   we have to put such strict limits on it.  
> 
>   Oh well -- I guess I'll keep on using AM at 9 kHz of bandwidth all the time 
> istead of the 4 to
> 6
>   kHz that I would normally have been running on SSB.  Be careful what you 
> ask for.
> 
>   Joe,
>   N3JI
> 
>   --- "Steven Grant, W4IIV" <stevengrant98@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>   > the reason they are doing this is because some folks love to have very 
> bassey audio. thier
> egos
>   > say that they must have broadcast quality audio.
>   > i dont think they will do away with AM or 10m FM
>   > i do believe that they need to limit SSB widths cause some of these 
> "morons" insist on
> taking up
>   > bandwidth with a 5kc wide SSB signal
>   > steven,   W4IIV
>   > 
>   > "R.Measures" <r@somis.org> wrote:
>   > 
>   > On Aug 25, 2004, at 1:12 PM, Joe Isabella wrote:
>   > 
>   > > Prezactly... Except that it allows wider digital modes in the "CW" 
>   > > bands, and it limits SSB Voice
>   > > to 3 kHz. I'm not a big fan of this move by the League -- seems silly 
>   > > to put these limits in
>   > > place on voice. I think I'll move to Canada...eh??
>   > >
>   > Joe -- Letting the amateur radio community determine how a band is used 
>   > has worked well enough on 160m. The vast CW wasteland presently on 80m 
>   > is a good example of bad rule-making.
>   > end
>   > 
>   > > Joe
>   > >
>   > > --- Vic Rosenthal wrote:
>   > >
>   > >> R.Measures wrote:
>   > >>
>   > >>> Thanks, Joe. So this means that if adopted, 10m FM as well as AM 
>   > >>> will
>   > >>> be illegal.
>   > >>
>   > >> The bandwidth allowed in 29.0 - 29.7 MHz is 16 KHz.
>   > >>
>   > >> There is a specific provision to allow DSB AM in the 3 KHz areas:
>   > >>
>   > >> "(1) The 3 kHz maximum bandwidth does not apply to double-sideband
>   > >> amplitude-modulated phone A3E emissions which are limited to --26 dB
>   > >> bandwidths of 9 kHz."
>   > >>
>   > >> You can read the whole thing at:
>   > >>
>   > >> 
>   > >>
>   > >> It's not going to make any revolutionary changes.
>   > >>
>   > >> -- 
>   > >> 73,
>   > >> Vic, K2VCO
>   > >> Fresno CA
>   > >> http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
>   > >>
>   > >>
>   > >> _______________________________________________
>   > >> Amps mailing list
>   > >> Amps@contesting.com
>   > >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>   > >>
>   > >
>   > >
>   > >
>   > > 
>   > > __________________________________
>   > > Do you Yahoo!?
>   > > Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
>   > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>   > > _______________________________________________
>   > > Amps mailing list
>   > > Amps@contesting.com
>   > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>   > >
>   > >
>   > Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org
>   > 
>   > _______________________________________________
>   > Amps mailing list
>   > Amps@contesting.com
>   > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > STEVEN GRANT    W4IIV
>   > 
>   > ---------------------------------
>   > Do you Yahoo!?
>   > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
>   > _______________________________________________
>   > Amps mailing list
>   > Amps@contesting.com
>   > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>   > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   _______________________________
>   Do you Yahoo!?
>   Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.
>   http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush
>   _______________________________________________
>   Amps mailing list
>   Amps@contesting.com
>   http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps



                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>