On May 24, 2006, at 6:08 AM, W0UN -- John Brosnahan wrote:
> At 06:03 AM 5/24/2006, R L Measures wrote:
>
>> On May 23, 2006, at 12:38 PM, W0UN -- John Brosnahan wrote:
>>
>>> At 11:14 AM 5/23/2006, R L Measures wrote:
>>>> Doug -- When I was occasionally running the Plywood Box 20db
>>>> amplifier on 40m, and I was answering questions about it over the
>>>> air, the FCC received a number of letters about me from
>>>> complainants. Thanks to an FCC employee who happened to be a
>>>> Ham who
>>>> guest operated at multi-multi contest stations, I learned that the
>>>> majority of these letters came from owners of contest stations
>>>> whose
>>>> amplifiers used tubes that had handles.
>>>> - cheerz
>>>
>>>
>>> Rich--
>>>
>>> This sounds like a cheap shot to me.
>>
>> It happened, John.
>
> Rich--
>
> I am not saying it didn't happen. What I AM saying is that your
> comment makes it sound like contesters running tubes with handles
> is rampant among the contest fraternity.
Not rampant, extant. Newington is not unaware of this.
> And what I am saying is
> that I have a pretty large, statistically-relevant sample, that
> contains
> NO contesters running tubes with handles. And in fact all of the
> BIG stations that I know are extremely diligent about running LEGAL
> power. To do otherwise would be to totally devalue the effort made
> to be competitive. It is my contention that winners win because
> they are better operators -- you make it sound like winners cheat.
Some have a remote-controlled big one put of sight in the garage and
some don't. Some rubber-clock and some don't.
> I can't say that no contester has ever cheated -- I don't KNOW that.
> What I do know is that I have seen many stations and they are all
> LEGAL.
Surely. And most holy men aren't attracted to the South end of altar-
boys heading North.
>
>>> I'm aware of (KC1XX, K1RX, K1TTT, W1KM, VY2ZM, W3LPL, K3LR, etc.)
>>> run
>>> strictly legal.
>>
>> ... and they never, ever drive faster than 65.00 mph on the
>> Interstates.
>
> This is a fallacious argument.
Is it not fallacious to assert that all, or nearly all contesters are
noble men without sin?
> Apples and oranges.
Granted. Speeding causes death, running serious suds seldom does.
> CONTESTERS (as
> opposed to those who might operate an occasional contest) are not in
> it for the money (!) they are in it for the personal satisfaction and
> recognition.
Bingo. Satisfaction from recognition and attention, one of the
prime motivators for humanoids. Drive a thirsty 400hp luxury SUV and
you buy attention and recognition from most folks. The History
Channel recently had a segment on John Leonard Orr, the Glendale Fire
Department's arson investigator who got satisfaction from setting
fires using one cigarette, 3-matches, and a rubber-band. The
motive: attention and recognition, the things he never got from his
parents when he was a child. Orr killed 5. including a 2-yr old boy.
> of their skills. To cheat would be to devalue their own efforts.
Some people see getting away with something as proof of their skill.
John Orr was an example.
>
> And (BTW) the little road that runs past our property has no shoulders
> and the lanes are barely wide enough for an RV trailer -- two oncoming
> trailers tend to drop their outer wheels off the road to clear each
> other.
> And the speed limit is 70 MPH!
damn
> And what does this have to do with
> contesting? Absolutely nothing, which is my point. Driving and
> contesting
> are not related.
The common denominator is homo sapiens. As I see it, Forrest Gump
("shit happens) and Puck ("what fools these mortals be") nailed it down
cheers, John.
>
> John W0UN
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
R L MEASURES, AG6K. 805-386-3734
r@somis.org
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|