Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Grid Vs cathode drive

To: "Bill Coleman" <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Grid Vs cathode drive
From: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Reply-to: John Vickers <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 13:15:18 -0400
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
>
> On Aug 3, 2006, at 5:56 PM, Tom W8JI wrote:
>
>> As far as I recall the 5 watt QRP thing wasn't popular at
>> all on HF until solid state. Like TT says 100W used to be
>> considered QRP.

Bill, AA4LR wrote:
> I was just looking at the 160m history information on your own site,
> Tom, and seems like there were plenty of guys in the 30s who ran a
> handful of watts.
>
> And there are certainly a lot of Novice rigs from the 50s and 60s
> that only managed a few watts out. The "Novice Special" comes to
> mind, at about 10-15 watts input.

Bill,
Thats certainly true. A major portion of the new hams I knew in the late 
50's early 60s got on with homebrew rigs. Single tube oscillators etc. BUT, 
below 100w was considered QRP.  My 6L6 osc and my 6DQ6 rigs were probably at 
best 20 watts. Anybody under 100 qualified for the QRP club. It still didn't 
change the fact that I was p*ss weak and the guys that provided me with all 
those magical Qs were the ones who deserved the credit. Some of them must'a 
had some fine receivers--- plus the fact the neighbors hadn't yet poluted 
the spectrum with all our modern gadgets !
73, WA4TT

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>