GGLL wrote:
> Ian White GM3SEK escribió:
>
>
>>Agreed.
>>
>>A large chunk of this problem is the creeping habit of sending an
>>individual 'courtesy' copy of a reply that is also being posted to the
>>list. Many kinds of e-mail software do this by default (unfortunately,
>>some would say) and they pick up the originator's address from the
>>message header.
>>
>>Many people (myself included) do not feel the need for that extra copy
>>at all. We're going to read your message on the list anyhow, and having
>>two copies in the system only invites confusion. You could say it is
>>more courteous *not* to send an extra copy.
>>
>
>
> I agree, one has to send only one copy. And also disagree with the
> "open
> full" access to the forum's messages including addresses, by anyone who do a
> simple search as Tony said.
> I don't know why, but in this regard I'm lucky. Although I see the amps
> reflector address among mine's in the recipients list, I always receive one
> message, not two.
I'm sure there's a setting in the preferences when you register that
removes the multiple copies if someone sends to the list and to the
individual.
Steve
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|