Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Regulations

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Regulations
From: peter chadwick <g8on@fsmail.net>
Reply-to: g8on@fsmail.net
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:35:56 +0200
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Roger,

It just so happens that at 1345 UTC this Saturday, I'm giving a presentation at 
the RSGB National Convention entitled 'Spreading the Sewage' - we didn't think 
that 'Spreading the S**t' was quite appropriate! I need to make sure that I 
have at least 2 if not 3 pints of beer available for refreshment during the 45 
minutes - although the other year, someone wrote to the RSGB General Manager 
afterwards to complain about me drinking beer during the presentation and 
livening it up with a dirty joke!

I have analysed the QST reviews of 123 transmitter/transceivers since 1973 for 
this, and the frightening thing is the way that while tube rigs in general had 
negligible 7th, 9th, 11th order IMDs, the solid state rigs do - and then some. 
Both the FTDX5000 and the FT1000D running in Class A are good.........but, I 
gather get hot.

As they say in Yorkshire "Tha don't get owt fer nowt".

The results make me glad I still run a tube PA transceiver!

73

Peter G3RZP
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>