Because Thailand supplies older 220VAC sockets only in a two-prong un-keyed
configuration, it appears that the hot side of the AC input could be on EITHER
of the wires (unless tested to find which socket hole is the hot and which the
neutral). Note there is NO third wire for ground. Note, you can not split the
220VAC off with one side of the supply and the other side to ground to get
115VAC, no no no.
Question.... given the info below from Lou et al, what are the consequences if
any to plugging these Ameritron amps into this kind of AC supply ?? That is
with the two prong plug turned either way upon insertion.
Tnx, Charly in Thailand
Charles Harpole
k4vud@hotmail.com
> To: amps@contesting.com
> From: gudguyham@aol.com
> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 07:48:15 -0400
> Subject: [Amps] Fwd: Ameritron AL-82/1200/1500 amps mis-wired!
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Louis Parascondola <gudguyham@aol.com>
> To: jim.thom <jim.thom@telus.net>
> Sent: Mon, Oct 14, 2013 7:15 am
> Subject: Re: [Amps] Ameritron AL-82/1200/1500 amps mis-wired!
>
>
> Jim, the interlock on these amps simply opens one leg of the 240v primary.
> When the cover is off the switch is open and if the amp is turned on the HV
> transformer will not get primary volt, hence no HV. BUT....due to the
> mis-wiring a path through the relay coil creates a small voltage (primary AC)
> that when rectified gives 400vdc with S5 (safety interlock switch) in the
> power supply and on the anodes. If you look at the schematic (which is
> correct) you won't see why it happens but with the mis-wiring, it happens. I
> emailed Ameritron the other day and got a response from MIKE. Mike said they
> knew about the problem and at some point in time they started to re-wire the
> units. HOWEVER...their "fix" still does not make the wiring conform to the
> schematic but the "fix" does stop the 400vdc. The fix is a band aid. Because
> the wiring is still wrong the step start circuit does not delay an additional
> 100ms. The schematic shows that the step start relay coil is to charge up
> through the 10 ohm step start resistor which is supposed to delay the relay
> closure by 100ms, add to that the 20ms of the contact closure time and you
> get 120ms of delay. With the "fix" you only get the 20ms of actuate time.
> If you know anything about these amps you would know that it is an ongoing
> problem that the step start relay contacts eventually weld shut. I have
> replaced many of them in 20 years. That whole circuit needs to be wired
> properly according to the schematic to satisfy both the HV leakage problem
> and the step start problem. UNFORTUNATELY ALL units in the field have either
> both or one of these problems. NO units in the field are wired 100%
> correctly. EVERY unit out there needs to be modified to reflect the
> schematic 100%. To save you the trouble of doping out the circuit, I have
> already done the doping out and figured out what needs to be done. There is
> also another wiring error, but I am not sure if they intentionally did a
> change and did not update the schematic. The primary wiring does not conform
> to the schematic either. The schematic shows that in the event either of the
> main 15A fuses blow the amp would completely shut down. HOWEVER....the way
> the units are wired if one particular main fuse blows the filament
> transformer still operates and you get blower, lights, and filament voltage,
> but you loose HV. This can cause you to continue to drive the tube with no
> HV present on the anode. The grid current goes very high and I suppose
> damage to the tube can occur. The filament transformer has a separate small
> 4A fuse to protect it but the line feeding it comes off the line side of the
> main fuse, hence if that main fuse blows the amp does not go completely dead
> as you may expect. The fix of course is to move the feed to the load side of
> the fuse as the schematic shows. They may have intentionally made this
> change but it is up to you to configure your unit the way you want. Lou
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Thomson <jim.thom@telus.net>
> To: amps <amps@contesting.com>
> Sent: Mon, Oct 14, 2013 5:24 am
> Subject: [Amps] Ameritron AL-82/1200/1500 amps mis-wired!
>
>
> Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 07:04:48 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Louis Parascondola <gudguyham@aol.com>
> To: amps@contesting.com
> Subject: [Amps] Ameritron AL-82/1200/1500 amps mis-wired!
>
> For those of you who might have any of these amps, they are mis wired. Seems
> that pretty much all of them going back quite some time. They are not wired
> according to the schematic and therefore a possible shock hazard is possible.
>
> One might assume that when interlock switch S5 is open (cover removed) that
> there is ZERO high voltage in the amp. But due to the mis wiring there is
> about
> 400vdc which is in the power supply and on the tube anodes. I suggest you
> "CAREFULLY" make the test to your amp to see if the problem exists. Simply
> remove the cover and turn the amp on and look at the HV meter. If you get
> any
> reading other than zero, your amp is mis-wired and you should consider wiring
> it
> properly. The fix is simple. There is a blue/white wire coming from the
> contactor relay going over to the step start relay at junction with R3.
> There
> is a wire on S5 (on left contact as viewed from front). These 2 wires need
> to
> be switched to conform to the schematic. In doing so, th
> e 400vdc with S5 open goes away. Although the manual states never to plug
> the
> amp in with the lid off, I know many of us do troubleshooting and we may
> wrongly
> assume that no HV is present when S5 is open. If you are not qualified to
> make
> the repair, ask someone that is to do it for you. I believe this is a repair
> that should be made to all these amps that exhibit this problem. Please be
> careful in making the test or doing the repair. Lou
>
> ## I have NOT looked at the schematic. Does the Interlock short the B+
> to
> the chassis..or does it open off the 240vac to the plate xfmr....or
> both....or
> what ??
> Is the problem on older amps... or newer vintage versions?? IE: how
> widespread is the issue ? Surprised somebody hasn’t fried themselves
> already.
> Either way, the correct procedure would be.... to also chassis ground the B+
> with an alligator clip. Then you know its at zero volts. Clip goes on
> 1st....and comes off dead last.
> Then if something else goes wrong...... you are covered. If you want to
> be
> super safe, use 2-3 clips..and grnd the B+ in two different places...like
> the
> anodes, and the B+ end of the
> string of HV filter caps. Another good place is directly between the B+
> and
> B- of the string of filter caps.
>
> ## Ameritron of course, should be notified. Its not a design issue, its
> an
> assembly issue. IF you have the SNs, they may be able to track it down to
> a
> specific employee or
> group of employees. If they cant, they truly are idiots.
>
> ## So much for any kind of testing of the finished product. IE: step 1,
> check interlock, does Vdc and or ACv drop to zero ? If not, check wiring
> XXX.
> Damned good thing they are not building medical or military or aircraft
> equipment.
>
> Jim VE7RF
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|