Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] PARALLEL CAPS IN OUTPUT

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] PARALLEL CAPS IN OUTPUT
From: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:54:06 -0800
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:21:59 -0500
From: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
To: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] PARALLEL CAPS IN OUTPUT

>
> ##  For folks with a PI net, make sure you use a piece of 50 ohm coax 
> between the load cap and the TR relay.
> And with shield bonded to chassis at BOTH ends.   If wire or cu strap is 
> used instead...then u end up with a huge Z bump.


**  The coax isnt long enough to act as a transmission line at HF....in most 
amps anyway.

####  OK, do it ur way.  Use a chunk of bare wire, strap etc..and watch the 
PI net load cap values change asap.   Ditto with coax...and only 1 end of 
shield bonded to
chassis.

###  strap, wire, etc is NOT 50 ohms, not even close.  Try it urself. 



> That alone will put the load cap at something higher than a 50 ohm 
> point... increasing the peak V.  On 10m band, the
> stray L  of a piece of wire instead of coax  will make the PI  now appear 
> as a PI-L.... putting the load cap at a much
> higher Z point.   same deal peak V increases.     Now with a wide open on 
> the ant, coax cable etc, the load cap
> will weld shut.

**  All the coax does is act as a shielded cable with some value of C.
At 10M even 1/10 wave of cable is 1.6' so it is invisible as coax.

#####  I don’t believe it for a second.  Of course, I have  tried it both ways.
Replacing the junk typ used from load cap to TR relay   will solve..and has 
solved all sorts of issues. 

Later....... Jim   VE7RF


 
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>