To: | amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] HV transformer and Variac |
From: | Ros <ros@netbox.com> |
Date: | Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:44:53 -0500 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
Have it your way, Don. My ego doesn't require me to go further - your
mind is made up.
Ros On 7/24/2015 9:41 AM, donroden@hiwaay.net wrote: Output VA + core loss + I2R wire loss = Input VA. Nothing magic going on here. Don W4DNR Quoting Ron Youvan <ka4inm@gmail.com>:On 07/24/2015 12:12 AM, Ros wrote:Semantic, Gary. My e.e. school said it is not a transformer in theclassic sense -"trans" as in transforming one voltage/current ratio intoanother with the added benefit of isolation which the autoformer does not provide. The losses go up simply due to the fact that there is a greater potential difference.This sounds a lot like you are saying an autotransformer does not act like a standard transformer with respect to the voltage/current ratio. This sounds a lot like you are saying a five Ampere autotransformer adjusted for an output of five Volts at five Amperes of will draw five Amperes (or even as much a one Ampere) at 120 Volts from the "mains." I know that this is not true. -- Ron KA4INM - Youvan's corollary: Every action results in unwanted side effects. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps_______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Odd query...., Gerald Williamson via Amps |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Odd query...., Roger (K8RI) |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] HV transformer and Variac, donroden |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] HV transformer and Variac, Steve Wright |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |