CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Partial Exchanges

To: "INTERNET:cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Partial Exchanges
From: Dave Lawley <g4buo@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:27:29 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
EI5DI wrote;

>.............  I owned up,
>and invited the organisers to disqualify me or admit that
>it doesn't really matter whether or not RST is actually
>sent.
>
>They did neither, which could be taken to mean that they
>didn't read what I put in my log, or they have no opinion
>one way or the other, or that the whole issue is too
>trivial for them to bother with.

There's another possibility. The CQWW checkers are so
very busy working to get the results out, that they really don't
need this sort of QRM. However, now that you have brought
this to everyone's attention, I feel that this year they should
look closely at your submission and if it's clear you consistently
failed to send RS(T), sorry but you should be disqualified.

Dave G4BUO



---------------------------------------------------------------
    The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
       http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>