Much as I would like to see everyone abide by a uniform set of rules, and
certain borderline-unethical practices stopped, it doesn't make a lot of
sense to impose rules where there is no means of detection or enforcement.
Over the years, we have seen ample proof that the honor system will not
prevent some individuals from breaking the rules and perhaps gaining an
undeserved victory. About the best we can do is publish a set of guidelines
-- sort of an honor code -- and hope that people will abide.
In the present question, I don't think we need a rule to prevent reception
before the contest begins. Frankly, I think the unenforceable rule about not
listening during breaks should be removed as well. The test of break time
should be whether or not a transmission was made. Like the "only one
transmitted signal" rule for SO2R, this is something that can be detected.
If everyone is allowed to listen during breaks, then the playing field is
level.
If unenforceable rules are made to satisfy someone's sense of what's
honorable, those who do not share the same sense of honor will cheat and get
away with it. As my Dad used to say, "You can't legislate morality."
73, Dick WC1M
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|