CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick

To: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>,"Steve London" <n2ic@arrl.net>, CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Another gratuitous SS-CW trick
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 16:07:29 -00
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

--
  http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb


> [Original Message]
> From: Ken Widelitz <widelitz@gte.net>

> True, the WRTC rule was there was no listening or transmitting prior to
the
> contest. No other contest of which I am aware currently has that rule.

I don't think the WRTC shoot-outs can be used as a "Gold Standard" against
which to compare other contest rules.  

When every other contest includes an impartial on-site referee at each
station, then we can start writing rules like "no populating your band map
with recent signals heard".

73, de Hans, K0HB
--
  "Everything not specifically prohibited is mandatory."
                                                   -W0VDI(sk)




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>