David Pruett wrote:
> There are a lot of contests which use Cabrillo as their "official"
> format but have not taken the time to be put on Trey's list.
I know of at least one that applied to be put on the list, but
received no response to repeated applications. What should be
done in these circumstances?
Igor Sokolov wrote:
>>If ARRL wants Cabrillo to become international standard for log
>>submission it should become more responsive and co-opertative.
David Pruett wrote:
> As for being "more responsive and co-operative", I don't see how
> they could be more so.
How can ARRL be responsive and co-operative with regard to something
it doesn't control, and probably has no wish to? Cabrillo is "owned"
by Trey, but he is not always able to respond to applications.
Isn't that the issue?
73,
Paul EI5DI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|