CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics
From: "Timo Klimoff" <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:48:12 +0300
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@mail.ee>

>I don't quite agree that you should always demand for you call repetition.
>
> For example:
> TEST ES5TV
> N1IK
> IK 5NN A5
> N1IK 5NN 5
> TU
>
> In that case I clearly say that I have got your call and I am sure abt it.

This is not a legitimate QSO. My opinion is that you have to say N1IK's call 
sign at least once, but his call can be said in more than one part. I 
somehow even remember that CQ Contest Committee (or Bob) has commented about 
this years ago.

TEST ES5TV
N1IK
IK 5NN A5
N1IK 5NN 5
N1 TU

73, Timo OH1NOA 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>