To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics |
From: | "Timo Klimoff" <timo.klimoff@dnainternet.net> |
Date: | Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:48:12 +0300 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk@mail.ee> >I don't quite agree that you should always demand for you call repetition. > > For example: > TEST ES5TV > N1IK > IK 5NN A5 > N1IK 5NN 5 > TU > > In that case I clearly say that I have got your call and I am sure abt it. This is not a legitimate QSO. My opinion is that you have to say N1IK's call sign at least once, but his call can be said in more than one part. I somehow even remember that CQ Contest Committee (or Bob) has commented about this years ago. TEST ES5TV N1IK IK 5NN A5 N1IK 5NN 5 N1 TU 73, Timo OH1NOA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics, N2TK, Tony |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics, Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO) |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics, N2TK, Tony |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics, Simon Pearson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |