Huh! How do you verify if they typed it correctly? They may even say your
call correctly but type it wrong. I've frequently had guys say my call wrong
but when I correct them they say that's what they've got. So no way you
should be responsible for another's error.
73, Don VE3XD
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Alfred J. Frugoli
(KE1FO)
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 7:12 AM
To: Lance
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics
You should be penalized because you didn't verify that they had your call
correctly. Typo's into the log will never work out right with the penalty
rule, but the idea is that each contact is an accurate *2 way* exchange of
information. You have 2 responsibilities during the exchange - that you
copy his info correctly, and you make sure he copies your info correctly.
73 de Al, KE1FO
Lance wrote:
>Amen! I've been penalized because "they" entered NW0L or KN0L, etc!
>I got their calls correctly, why should I be penalized for their
mistake(s)?
>
>73, WN0L
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <K3BU@aol.com>
>To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
>Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 8:39 AM
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB. Mathematics
>
>
>
>
>>In a message dated 8/1/2005 7:38:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
>>
>>
>k9gx@n4gn.com
>
>
>>writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>Fortunately beyond just making the Qs one must copy and log calls
>>>>and
>>>>
>>>>
>>exchanges correctly.<<
>>
>>...and pray that other people log YOU correctly, don't delete you from
>>
>>
>their
>
>
>>log (M/S "timing thing"), they don't press wrong key or computer
>>doesn't
>>
>>
>wipe
>
>
>>bunch of QSOs or you will be punished with 4 QSO's removal "to punish
>>you
>>
>>
>for
>
>
>>sloppy logging and teach you a lesson how to log properly".
>>Isn't it time to remove this 3 QSO "penalty" stuff?
>>It was meant to punish those who left the dupes in their old paper
>>logs,
>>
>>
>when
>
>
>>you had the control over duping and it was justified then, but now?
>>
>>73 Yuri
>>_______________________________________________
>>CQ-Contest mailing list
>>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
>
--
73 de Al, KE1FO
www.ke1fo.info
--
Reclaim Your Inbox!
http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|