To: | "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Phonetics |
From: | "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net> |
Date: | Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:48:52 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> Why don't WE as contesters come up with a UCP (list of >"Universal > CONTESTER Phonetics") that can solve most of the >problems? Hi Rick I remember some ham phoenetics that used to work pretty good. They started out with: Able, Baker, Charlie, Dog, Easy, Fox, George, Henry, Ida, etc etc. Remember those? They were HAM phoenetics. 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet, N7MAL |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Voice Keyer, Jacob W Tennant |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Phonetics, Bill Turner |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Phonetics, N5IET Bob |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |