CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions

To: Bob Naumann - W5OV <W5OV@W5OV.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions
From: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:36:02 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Bob Naumann - W5OV wrote:

>(By the way, the runner-up for "Silliest Comment on CQ-Contest for 2005" was
>the related pointing out that packet is not packet if it's via the Internet.
>Watch for a special report from John Stossel on ABC's 20/20 as a "Give me a
>break" story in 2006.)
>
>  
>
Bob, are referring to my earlier comments?:

"First, an issue of semantics.  I don't use packet.  I use telnet. Not 
many use packet any more... "

Just to make it clear, I did NOT mean this to be way around the rules regarding 
"packet."  I was just pointing out the term "packet" is used incorrectly.  It 
is a mode, just like CW, SSB, Baudot, and PSK.  Packet should not be synonymous 
with DX spotting.

I don't think that's silly, do you?

Barry



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>