CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules
From: dave@ka1n.cn
Date: 16 Mar 2007 17:30:49 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
This probably should be something for the contest committee to address.  

Due to politics and technology, contesting is changing.  This is inevitable.  

Nevertheless, there are more fundamental questions involved, which strike at 
the heart of amateur radio and contesting.

Namely:

1) Must an operator have to contend with the same physical and legal conditions 
of the location that he represents that he is located?  It probably is 
physically possible to set up a remote station on CY9/0 right now.  Usually, 
these locations take considerable effort, risk, time, and expense to activate.  
This is why they are rare.  But using such a remote station in a contest would 
mean that the presence of SOME person was on that island at one time is enough 
to allow any operator to ?contest? from such an location.

When an operator is physically present in a location, he must contend with 
site-specific challenges.  For example, they must 1) secure visas and travel to 
that location; 2) acclimate him/herself to the local cuisine; and 3) remain 
safe.  The harder it is to do these things, the more rare the mult.  Remote 
contesting will drastically change the equation.  Not only can operators 
?instantly? travel to places that take a long time to travel to, but they can 
be assured that their ?support? network of family and local business can supply 
them with provisions.  Also, operators would not longer have to account for 
possible physical or political upheavals.  If things get bad, they can just 
shut down their internet connection.

Maybe a good analogy is the furor, some time ago, surrounding 
internet-controlled sport hunting.  As I understand it, many hunters thought it 
was bad sportsmanship to have condemned animals released into a controlled area 
and shot by a gun that was positioned and "fired" by remote-control from 
anywhere in the world.  

2) Maybe the 500-meter rule does inhibit some technological advancements.  For 
example, a contester with two non-contiguous pieces of property (perhaps on 
opposite sides of a mountain or river within the same multiplier) might want to 
have a remote internet-connected receiver that provides a constant audio stream 
to the main shack.  This probably does not drastically alter the spirit of 
contesting in any major way, and should be viewed in the same way that wireless 
ethernet or wireless keyboards might be.

73,
 Dave/KA1NCN
Dave@KA1N.CN

.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>