Hi Mike:
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Mike Reagan" <mreagan@preciscom.net>
> [...]
> remote stations for M/M, M2, and M/S operations and remote receivers for all
> of us are readily available...[...]Perhaps some are already doing this...the
> advantage for same band S&P would be worth the effort..as would the use of a
> location with more favorable terrain to a particular direction...since all
> the equipment is already in place the cost is close to zero...
I hope that no one is doing this (remote receivers) in the ARRL contests
or the CQWW/CQ WXP, where it is against the rules. Using remote receive sites
would be a HUGE advantage.
>
> Getting back to the rules ... I suggest we should find a place for all new
> technology..that is what this hobby is all about..finding new, better and in
> some cases just differing ways of communicating...
I think that communicating using RF is the heart and soul of Amateur Radio
and would hate to see the magic disappear in favor of better ways of
communicating.
>
> Mike Reagan
> NI7T
> Price, Utah
> http://www.ni7t.com
>
73,
Mark, KD4D
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|