CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges

Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges
From: "Cedrick \"Fred\" Johnson - WT2P" <fredwt2p@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:21:33 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
My radio is ghetto. It's stuck on 59.

I see I haven't missed much since 2002.......


-wt2p

Dave/KA1NCN wrote:
> Why disqualify the big gun?  Every station that works him as the opportunity 
> to demand a signal report.  In fact, they have the duty!  Yet, in listening 
> to a few stations giving serial numbers only this weekend (probably 3 or 4 
> hours in total), I never heard a single one ask for a signal report.    
> Secondly, I disagree with the notion that a report is entirely subjective.  
> The “S” part, as I understand it, is supposed to be derived from whatever 
> one’s S-meter is reading.  So, at a minimum, a third party, standing over the 
> shoulder of the “giver” of the report would be able to verify that at a given 
> moment a signal caused a certain S-meter to give a certain reading.
>     73, Dave/KA1NCN dave@ka1n.cn
>
>        
> ---------------------------------
> Special deal for Yahoo! users & friends - No Cost. Get a month of Blockbuster 
> Total Access now
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>   

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>