CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer

from [Tom Osborne] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer
From: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:33:05 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> 
Dave said:

>It doesn't simply make me more  efficient ... it makes me unnecessary for 
> >that part of the activity.

That is the sad part of it Dave.  73
Tom W7WHY


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [CQ-Contest] Remote Operation Reflector?, Paul Mackanos - K2DB
Next by Date:  [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER, Larry Schimelpfenig
Previous by Thread:  Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, David Gilbert
Next by Thread:  Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, K0HB
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]