CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Best & worst scenarios - 3830 postings

To: Mark Beckwith <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Best & worst scenarios - 3830 postings
From: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Actually Mark, since you assume only BAD things if/when a new call shows up in 
the box, it *does* sounds like a witch hunt!

73 - Jim AD1C

 --
Jim Reisert AD1C/Ø, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us



----- Original Message ----
From: Mark Beckwith <n5ot@n5ot.com>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2008 5:30:56 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Best & worst scenarios - 3830 postings

[...]

The introduction of a new call to the box in the finals is rightly highly 
suspicious and it's better for everyone when that does not happen.  Did he 
change categories?  Did he massage his log?  Did the sponsor accept his log 
after the deadline?

That's not a witch hunt.  That's due dilligence.  It's also easily avoided 
which is good for everyone.  Which is what this is about.

Mark, N5OT 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>