To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Best & worst scenarios - 3830 postings |
From: | "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com> |
Date: | Tue, 2 Sep 2008 20:21:34 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Ron said: > You are proposing that the 3830 reflector be used for something other > than it's original purpose, and that it's use be made mandatory. That's a stretch. Eric's exact words were "Moral of the story is if you are a top score then you should post to 3830." There's some distance between "should" and "mandatory." Mark, N5OT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Best & worst scenarios - 3830 postings, N7mal |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Rohn 45 vs 55, Tony Rogozinski |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Best & worst scenarios - 3830 postings, Ron Notarius W3WN |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Best & worst scenarios - 3830 postings, N7mal |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |