Kelly said:
> While it is something that has not, as far as I know, been adhered to
[snip]
> That the rule has not been enforced does not, in my mind, mean it is
> not a reasonable explanation of what is expected by both parties in
> a QSO.
Hey Kelly.
I agree with you completely that it is a reasonable explanation of what is
expected. It takes place successfully roughly 95% of the time. However,
the rules do not say that each operator is expected to send what they got
back to make sure it was okay. Enforcement to the degree that a good
operator gets penalized for errorless operation on his part and no knowledge
of error on the part of another is:
unreasonable.
Mark, N5OT
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|