Mark Beckwith wrote::
> ...that a good operator gets penalized for errorless operation on his
> part and no knowledge of error on the part of another is: unreasonable.
>
Happens in WWDX, too. Soft- or hardwarecrash, a running station deleting
a difficult qso afterwards when in doubt, deleting a qso to escape band
change rules - and your earn a NIL even when you are innocent. But
incentives to improve accuracy with respect to the sending stations,
too, aren´t too bad per se. I quickly looked at the RDXC top ten in
SOAB-HP mix and CW and found only very few minor changes in ranking - so
no devastating effect of the "unreasonable" rule.
Have fun - and PLEASE log my qrp-signal!
73, Chris
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|