CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WAEDC CW: only for Extra class USA

To: CQ-CONTEST@CONTESTING.COM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WAEDC CW: only for Extra class USA
From: Marc Domen <on7ss.oo9o@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:11:28 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
That's right, you can't be DQed with a checklog, but some others could be if
you use exact frequency in your checklog.

My opinion on the rule is this.
Because this is a IARU Region 1 recommondation, it only applies to stations
in Region 1, and I read it this way "do not call CQ Contest outside the
contest preffered segments", but if a non Region 1 station calls CQ outside
the segment you can answer his call.

If you see the number of stations in big SSB contests calling CQ in the CW
portion of 40m I think my point of view is not over the edge.

73 cu in test (sri not in the WAe, I am away on holliday with no
radioequipment)

Marc, ON7SS - OO9O

2009/7/30 VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>

> > If enough people are really dissatisfied with the rules and don't
> operate,
> > maybe declining log numers will give a clue to the contest sponsors.
> Maybe
> > not.
> > 73, Zack W9SZ
>
> An other way to show one's disapprobation without giving the victory to the
> ''no-code digital mode dunderheads'' is to run the contest without
> respecting this rule, having the fun of the contest, sending one's score on
> 3830 to have an idea of one's position and just send a checklog with a
> little comment to the sponsor.
>
> I do not think that one can be DQed with a checklog...
>
> Gilles VE2TZT
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>