CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE

To: "CQ CONTEST" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE
From: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Reply-to: Vladimir Sidorov <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:59:10 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Just curious, why virtually all (big) contests' sponsors support all kind of 
stuff like packet, skimmers and even create unbelievable classes like 
Xtreme, but nobody has created and maintained just a single pure radio 
operator's contest...
Nope. Sorry.

Yet another vox clamantis in deserto.

73,
Vladimir VE3IAE

---


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
To: "CQ CONTEST" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 5:27 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE


> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Martin Monsalvo, LU5DX" <lu5dx@yahoo.com>
>
> <snip>
>
>> I know people who don't like this idea bring to attention
>> several other ways of cheating in our hobby, but we are
>> not talking about those, in this case we are talking about
>> the use of packet, telnet, web clusters, or even DX alerts
>> made by friends on VHF.!
>
> My hobby is amateur radio contesting.  Your's is something
> else - I suggest internet contesting.
>
> Just as there is a difference between the internet and amateur
> radio, there is a difference between internet contesting and
> amateur radio contesting.  The difference between them should
> continue to be recognised by retaining the single-op (radio)
> and single-op assisted (internet) classes.
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>