To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation |
From: | Mark <pa5mw@home.nl> |
Reply-to: | pa5mw@home.nl |
Date: | Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:08:31 +0100 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
In my personal opinion yes that's fair. Next, since it is a different country with a different administration and possible hamradio rules, you need to get a new different callsign anyway. I do not understand the 'penalty'. Kind regards, Mark, PA5MW On 2-3-2011 15:27, Doug Renwick wrote: > When you carefully look at the current rule 9, it also penalizes people who > move. As an example suppose one lived near the border of an European > country, and moved across the border into the neighbouring country. One > would have to start over again. Fair? _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation, Pete Smith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation, David Gilbert |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC updated FAQ - Remote operation, Doug Renwick |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] 2011 NAQP RTTY - February - All 3830 Claimed Scores 01Mar2011, n7wa |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |