CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Inequity of Zone Checking

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Inequity of Zone Checking
From: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 21:43:29 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 30/11/2011 20:40, Radio K0HB wrote:

> I've carefully examined the CQWW rules, and they do not support your
> assertion.

The rules specify what elements entrants are obliged
to exchange on-air.  They do not indicate what happens
to these exchange elements during log checking.

RST and Zone are not checked in CQWW, but callsigns
most certainly are.


> It would be a total "inequity" if the
> contest sponsor does not consistently cross check that each transmission
> was properly copied and logged, imposing a burden on those operators who
> took the care to follow the rule.

K0HB is right.  However, there is nothing in the CQWW
rules to say that RST and Zone have to be copied
accurately, or that points will be lost for errors in
copying them.  Rule 6 says "Bad QSO: The bad QSO is
removed and a penalty of three more equivalent QSOs
is applied to the points only".  The rules do not
offer a definition of a bad QSO.  In practice, for
CQWW, bad QSOs and their associated penalties relate
only to those with callsign errors - with time, band
and mode discrepancies being separate issues.

73,
Paul EI5DI












_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>