Thanks, all, for the kind words. We did have a little trouble with one
of our Telnet servers late Saturday morning, but some quick CPR by Dave,
KM3T got it running again. The spot volume was nothing like CQWW, but
we did hit peaks of 1300 spots per minute at times, which is still
pretty amazing.
As one who is complicit in this minor revolution, I felt occasionally as
if I was hoist by my own petard. I would find myself a run frequency,
call CQ a couple of times, and get a solid wall of sound for my reward.
It was really hard to pick out even fragments of callsigns. I've run at
high rates before - 150 QSO hours in CQWW over the years - and I coped
all right, but it did seem to me that zero-beat callers were much more
common than last year, for example. Of course, DX spots are only posted
to an accuracy of 0.1 KHz, so if people simply click on a spot, and ten
or fifteen do this at once, then it's all one big mosh pit.
In an effort to improve the productivity of my S&P endeavors with
Skimmer spots this weekend, I made a point of tweaking my main tuning by
50-100 Hz after jumping on a spot, before calling. I seemed to get
through fairly well doing this, and I certainly noticed that when I was
running and the mosh pit effect was going on, I could easily pick out
stations that were operating a bit off the consensus frequency.
Just a thought ... everybody wins if you tune a bit first after jumping
on a spot.
73, Pete N4ZR
The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at
reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000 and
arcluster.reversebeacon.net, port 7000
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|