It's worth remembering that other US territories are separate DXCC entities,
explaining why they are separate multipliers in, for example, the NAQP.
Personally, I agree that DC ought to be a separate multiplier when states (but
not sections) are multipliers.
Of course, I also can't quite get the hang of independent cities not being
equivalent to counties under MARAC rules. But that comes from having been a
county-counter (physically visiting counties; independent cities are considered
as county-equivalents) before having discovered county-hunting.
But hey, it's the organizers' contests/awards, so they get to make the rules.
--
Michael D. Adams (AB1OD) | Poquonock, Connecticut | mda@ab1od.org
On Aug 11, 2012, at 9:35 AM, Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net> wrote:
> Oh, we could have a lot of fun with the semantics. After all, technically,
> isn't Puerto Rico a Commonwealth as well?
>
> However... VA, MA, KY & PA are political entities that have been admitted to
> the Union. So from that standpoint, they are States for the purposes of
> determining what is and is not a multiplier.
>
> And as a practical matter, there is no difference between the State of PA &
> the Commonwealth of PA. The State/Commonwealth government uses the two
> terms interchangeably.
>
> Now, I don't have a problem with DC being it's own mult. I'd simply ask
> that IF it is determined by the appropriate folks, with the appropriate
> input from the reflector & other sources, the rule modifications make it
> clear as to WHY DC is going to be a mult, but other populated US territories
> that are not States are not.
>
> Otherwise, one could make a case for PR & VI, as populated US territories
> within the generally accepted bounds of North America, should also be mults.
> Is that what you want? Or would that be an unanticipated consequence?
>
> 73, ron w3wn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Embry
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 8:59 PM
> To: George Fremin III
> Cc: Mike Tessmer; cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP
>
> All,
>
> If this is indeed the case, then perhaps Virginia, Massachusetts, Kentucky,
> and Pennsylvania, while politically different are technically Commonwealths
> and not States.
>
> While I will admit that DC is not a state, but Constitutionally a 'Federal
> City' is is a separate political entity. Personally, I can see no reason
> why DC should not be its own mult. But, one wants to play semantics with
> words and definitions, then remove the Commonwealths as multipliers.
>
> 73,
>
> Jeff
> K3OQ
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, August 10, 2012, George Fremin III wrote:
>
>> The mults in NAQP are US states, Canadian provinces and north American
>> countries.
>>
>> DC is not a state.
>>
>> The rules do mention DC and say that it counts as MD for this contest.
>>
>> --
>> George Fremin III
>>
>>
>> On Aug 10, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Mike Tessmer
> <mtessmer@mindspring.com<javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> With this talk about new sections/multipliers, I think what NN3W may
>> have hinted at is:
>>>
>>> Why is DC not a multiplier in the NAQP?
>>>
>>> I asked this same question a few years ago and got exactly one answer
>> that implied that adding DC might render all NAQP records meaningless, or
>> something to that effect. That's a very weak argument in that having
>> someone show up from DC would have no more effect on any record than
> having
>> someone show up from Greenland or any Caribbean or Central American
>> country. (Yet we'd all be saying "Great to see some DX activity!"}
>>>
>>> So I'll toss it out there again:
>>>
>>> - Why not add DC as a mult in NAQP?
>>> - What would be a valid reason not to?
>>>
>>> Perhaps one of the NAQP managers might chime in.
>>>
>>>
>>> 73, Mike K9NW
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Embry, K3OQ
> FM19nb
> ARCI #11643, FPQRP #-696,
> QRP-L # 67, NAQCC #25, ARS #1733
> AMSAT LM-2263
>
> --
> Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of
> enthusiasm. - Sir Winston Churchill
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|