CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP

To: "Paul Stoetzer" <n8hm@arrl.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP
From: "Jim Jordan" <k4qpl@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 07:34:19 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
IMHO this(that DC is a top level political subdivision) is the one single, 
logical, reasonable, equitable, fair (I'll stop here with synonyms) reason 
that DC should be a separate multiplier. Not for historical reasons, not to 
make it more fun for the residents, not to be another multiplier, not to 
have another multiplier to chase, and not to bash, or honor, our UNITED 
states government which is headquartered there. We could make all those 
other arguments for making most any other state capital, city or county a 
multiplier. If the contest sponsors will simply strike one blow for 
CONSISTENCY, DC will be a multiplier and the gazillion electrons we are 
rearranging in this thread would be irrelevant.

73,

Jim, K4QPL

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Stoetzer" <n8hm@arrl.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP


> They are. As is UN Headquarters.
>
> It's silly that a building in Manhattan is a multiplier but the District
> of Columbia is not. The fact is that the District of Columbia is the
> only separate top-level political subdivision within the United States
> or Canada that is not a multiplier in NAQP.
>
> 73,
>
> Paul, N8HM
>
> On 8/11/2012 10:16 AM, Aldewey@aol.com wrote:
>> Correct me if I'm wrong but PR and VI ARE multipliers in NAQP.  Right?
>> What am I missing?
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Al, K0AD
>>
>>
>> In a message dated 8/11/2012 8:36:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
>> wn3vaw@verizon.net writes:
>>
>> Otherwise, one could make a case for PR & VI, as populated US 
>> territories
>> within the generally accepted bounds of North America, should  also be
>> mults.
>> Is that what you want?  Or would that be an  unanticipated  consequence?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>