That's nice. But...what do you do for the first six hours of the contest
since most people will be QRT for that. Why make a 100 Qs for 100 points
when you can make 4 Qs the last hour for 120? Anyone with half a brain
would take the first six hours off.
Bill K4XS
In a message dated 2/11/2013 12:40:35 A.M. Coordinated Universal Tim,
nn4x@embarqmail.com writes:
Why have a simple solution when a complicated one will do? ;-)
Let's take a page from the Stew Perry contest, and have variable points
awarded, except instead of for distance (how last-century is THAT?),
let's make it based upon WHEN the QSO occurred! There are 30 hours in
the contest.
How about QSO Point Value = sequential hour of contest? QSO's made from
21:00 - 21:59:59 are 1 point, but QSO's made from 22:00 - 22:59:59 are 2
points, and from 23:00 - 23:59:59 are 3 points, etcetera, until you're
at Sunday, at 02:00 - 20:59:59, and they're worth a whopping 30 points/QSO!
Alternatively, we could wait until after the logs have been submitted,
and QSO's +/- 1 standard deviation of the highest activity hour for
each day are worth 1 point, those 2 standard deviations away worth 5
points, and 3 standard deviations away are worth 20 points. This would
create a game-within-a-game, where the competitors would not only be
trying to make as many QSO's as possible, but trying to figure out when
everyone ELSE was making the majority of their QSO's and try to operate
outside of that time.
Tongue firmly in cheek (or is it?)...
73,
Steve
NN4X
EL98jh
On 2/10/2013 4:12 PM, Jimk8mr@aol.com wrote:
> Let's get back to the simple suggestion most recently made by K2AV (with
my
> enthusiastic second):
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|