CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Sundays

To: stan@aqity.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Sundays
From: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:18:20 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The present rules, or rules with a no return to a previous  callsign, 
affect only those who wish to submit a log. It does not  affect a person whose 
only interest is inflating the numbers of a  friend. It does not affect the 
person with whom those 100 unique are made.  (Although such a high unique 
number would likely catch the notice of log  checkers, who might find other 
ways 
to handle the entry of  the beneficiary.)
 
The rules as presently written do affect somebody who would like to  get on 
and spend a couple of hours as a new guy working lots of different people  
in the late hours.
 
The CQ contests do not have such a prohibition. Have you noticed a problem  
in them?
 
 
73  -   Jim   K8MR
 
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 2/11/2013 7:39:32 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
wa5rtg@gmail.com writes:

Jim,

I fail to see where forbidding the use of a previous  call after the use of
a new one does anything to prevent any abuse.   Drop 3.3 and 3.5 and allow
someone to use as many calls as they want as  long as they don't go back to
one already used?  So with permission  from every ham in your home town you
could make however many contacts you  wanted with 25, 50 or 100 different
callsigns as long as you didn't go back  to one already used?
73...Stan, K5GO
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:12 PM,  <Jimk8mr@aol.com> wrote:


> Forbidding the use of a  previous call
> after  use of a new one begins would be  sufficient.
>
> All this will take is for the ARRL to drop General  Rules 3.3 and 3.5.
>
>
> 73  -  Jim    K8MR


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>