CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

To: "Dale Putnam" <daleputnam@hotmail.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
From: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Igor Sokolov <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 02:08:14 +0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Or... you may choose assisted cathegory in WPX :)

73, Igor UA9CDC

----- Original Message ----- From: "Dale Putnam" <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 12:12 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened


OR.. as a little pistol, and knowing full well that my point to him is as valuable as it willbe.. I may elect to let him find me, later, when he climbs down off his high horse and actually starts working people instead of working calls. And when it gets to cq dupe.. maybe he can find me.. and maybe not.. in either case,the Qs I make, not waiting for him are worth a whole lot more than the time spent waiting.And some of the others feel that they can always.. not matter what.. find all the mults they need,that maybe true.. but I won't be able to find all the Qs that I can make sitting around waiting for someoneto take all that precious time to id...

Have a great day,


--...   ...--
Dale - WC7S in Wy




This is reasonable to me. As a really little pistol most of the time, I'm
not going to get through on the first call if the guy has that big of a
pileup. If I'm going to spend a few minutes calling him to get a QSO, I may
as well wait for him to ID and then start calling if he's not a dupe.
info/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>