CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
From: john@kk9a.com
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:15:49 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
If this needs to be in the rules, IDing at least once a minute seems
reasonable.  The good ops will continue to ID more frequently as the
pileup conditions allow and the bad ones will just have to not use QRZ as
their callsign once a minute.

John KK9A / P40A


To:      "'Bob Shohet, KQ2M'" <kq2m@kq2m.com>,  <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject:         Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
From:    "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
Date:    Sun, 02 Feb 2014 13:56:58 -0800

Hi Bob,



Agree entirely. You hit the nail on the head. The idea is to ID only
frequently enough to keep the pileup to just a few callers. Requiring ID's
is a good idea, but it is a time issue, not a number of QSOs issue. A once a
minute rule works for me.



73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>