Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

[Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@verizon.net>]

Thats not what the FCC said in its callsign identification NPRM 
rejection.  Nor is the term communication explicitly defined.
73 Rich NN3W

On 2/4/2014 9:58 AM, Radio K0HB wrote:
> Absolutely!
>
>
> Identifying after every contact is required under the rules in the USA.  
> 97.119(a) isn't a suggestion, it's a hard bound rule.
>
>
>
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> 🌵Sent from Arizona 🌞
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Steve IK4WMH <ik4wmh@virgilio.it> wrote:
>
> > Guys,
> > I think WPX and all the other contests and dxpeditions would be much
> > better if all participants would act like Nigel G3TXF (just to name
> > one) who, regardless if he's dxpeditioning or contesting from home or
> > some exotic places, signs his full callsign after *EVERY* qso.
> > That's TOP CLASS, you should learn from him instead of complaining on
> > how many QSOs or minutes must pass before you feel comfortable to ID.
> > Steve IK4WMH
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest