CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
From: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 12:17:49 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Bill, you are confusing peak per minute rates with average hourly rates. 
Doing the rates LY8O stated for one minute is very possible, even for me. 
Keeping this pace for 60 minutes is something only N5TJ K9PG and JA3ODC can 
do.

John KK9A


To:cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject:Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
From:Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date:Sun, 2 Feb 2014 09:15:47 -0500 (EST)
List-post:<cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

480 Qs per hour on SSB?  Pretty good op.

Bill K4XS


In a message dated 2/2/2014 2:07:48 P.M. Coordinated Universal Time,
r.vaicius@ando.lt writes:

t could  be around 4 QSOs in CW and around 8 QSOs on  SSB. 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>