Hi Dave,
Yes I do the same, I upload to eQSL but don't use it myself.
I have nothing against eQSL "administrators" and it seems they're doing a good
job, however the fact that matching is not "blind" and the fact you can claim
"WSPR" QSOs or SWL QSLs that are technically no different that 2-ways QSLs
leads to some abuses...
73,
Yan.
---
Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y
http://xv4y.radioclub.asia/
http://varc.radioclub.asia/
Le 13 févr. 2014 à 06:47, David Siddall a écrit :
> Yan,
>
> I don't CHECK eQSL requests, but I download my logs there (as well as LoTW)
> so those who wish my QSL get it if correct call is in both logs -- and only
> if correct call is in both logs, same as LoTW, since I don't review unmatched
> cards. Mostly appreciated by CQ award hunters & those who enjoy viewing
> various QSL cards, which LoTW doesn't offer. This way works same as LoTW
> with minimal effort on my part. I was impressed that my LU/ log (LU0 for CQ
> prefix hunters) wasn't accepted until their Argentine representative signed
> off on it as legitimate, even though LU is not exactly a rare catch for most
> purposes.
>
> 73, Dave K3ZJ
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:08 PM, XV4Y (Yan) <xv4y@nature-mekong.com> wrote:
> Hi Dale,
>
> Well, DXKeeper is free and has a very good integration with LotW.
> I use N1MM for actually logging the QSOs at my operating position, but
> transfer them to DXKeeper for all the "log managing" and QSLing.
>
> I have 193 confirmed countries with LotW for 223 worked. Only CW and SSB,
> really few DIGI.
> I was more than surprised of that confirmation rate, but it I confirm you
> receive more confirmation from contesters and CWers than from SSB DXers...
> I don't look at eQSL anymore as I receive far to more fake QSO requests.
>
> 73,
> Yan.
> ---
> Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y
> http://xv4y.radioclub.asia/
> http://varc.radioclub.asia/
>
> Le 13 févr. 2014 à 00:00, cq-contest-request@contesting.com a écrit :
>
> > Message: 6
> > Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:29:05 -0700
> > From: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
> > To: Scott Monks <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com>,
> > "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>,
> > "rtty@contesting.com" <rtty@contesting.com>
> > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates
> > Message-ID: <COL127-W36E6CFB6095EB3A0AAAB46D0920@phx.gbl>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > My Winlog32 does the eQSL thing automatically.. it does NOT do LOTW auto..
> > far from it.IN FACT.. I have not been successful with LOTW in well over two
> > years. IF winlog32 or any logging program.. like N1MM would do the LOTW
> > auto.. I'd be plumb happy...and so would a whole lotta other folk too. (the
> > ones that need a WY confirmation).
> >
> > Have a great day,
> >
> >
> > --... ...--
> > Dale - WC7S in Wy
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|